WE ARE NOT “STARVING”
If I could wave a magic wand and make the phrase “starving artist” disappear from the lexicon, I would.
Why characterize artists as starving? We don’t say “starving” about any other job that’s unlikely to produce a high income. We don’t say “starving minister” or “starving busboy” or “starving gas station employee,” even though artists are, in many instances, a whole lot more likely to make a million dollars than a minister, a busboy or the clerk at your local gas station.
So, what’s the story?
People love to put artists down. “Oh, you’re an actor? Which restaurant?” Ha. Ha. “You’re a stand-up comedian? Say something funny.” We don’t put other professions on the spot. You never hear someone say, “Oh, you’re a florist? Arrange something.” (We do often put doctors and lawyers on the spot, but not because we want to test their right to claim their calling. We put them on the spot because we want free advice.) And, perhaps the ultimate most-often-heard insult, “Any three year-old could paint better than that. Heck, I could paint better than that.” Or sing better or write better or whatever better. And: Maybe they could. But they don’t. And chances are they’ve never tried.
Because as much as people may want to test, to deride, to sneer at art and artists as something incomprehensible and unnecessary, their teasing has the same root as any it does in any schoolyard: people fear what they need but don’t understand.
And make no mistake, people need art.
My Performance Studies professor at Northwestern, the late ethnographer Dwight Conquergood, used to say that we should be called "Homo Narratus" rather than "Homo Erectus," because while other animals move upright, as far as we know, none of them tell stories in quite the same way we do.
We humans love to create art: cave drawings, stories to explain the night sky, songs for hunting and for childbirth. Humans are endlessly interested in other humans.
We want to see stories about them acted out on television, we want to hear jokes about them, we want to hear songs about them, we want to read books about them; our appetite for information about other people is insatiable. And it is art that feeds that appetite. No one knows why we have this capacity for self-reflection, but we do.
Artists, like shamans, mystics and priests, explain us to ourselves.
So let the others jeer – they may mock us, but they cannot live without us.
The impulse to squelch, to judge, to critique and to deride art isn’t going away. And hey, we ask for it, don’t we? We’re the ones hanging our work out there at the poetry slam or the art fair just inviting other people to throw rotten tomatoes at it.
Or roses. Sometimes they throw roses.
And sometimes they throw money. And once that happens, no one will ever call you starving again.
Recent Comments